What We're Reading This Week

Another hectic week at Trada. Also, if you’re around next week, it is Boulder Startup Week from May 2 – May 6. Check out the events and be sure to RSVP for Burgers at Trada. We’ll cap off attendance at 100. Be sure to let our CEO, Niel Robertson (@nielr1), know how you like your burger cooked. I like my burger medium well! Time to recap some must reads for your weekend for online advertising, paid search, entrepreneurship and small business.

And for fun – two months after starting at Trada, I still don’t have a business card. But you should check out this Jaffe Juice episode that features my creative solution to a lack of a business card.

Know Your Numbers – The Achilles Heel of Small Business Advertising

Do you know your Achilles Heel?

I spend a lot of my time talking to small- and medium-sized businesses about online advertising. One of the first questions I ask them is “what can you afford to spend to get a sale?” The majority of time I get a blank stare or a half hearted “we kind of know.” If you don’t know the answer to this question, stop everything you are doing and figure it out now. The old adage in business applies here – if you don’t know your numbers, you’re losing money.

In general, there are two basic ways people end up making money with their websites: they sell something or they get a lead who  eventually they can sell something to. The process of figuring out how much you can afford to spend on each one of these is basically the same, the latter only having one more step in the process. Here’s how you do it.

The first thing you need to do is figure out what your average cost of sale is. Let’s use a simple example where you only sell one product online and it costs $75. How much of that $75 can you afford to spend on sales and marketing? This number is different for every business, but let’s say in our example you can afford to spend $25 dollars to get each sale (leaving you $50 in profit before other costs like salaries and things). This is your target CPA (cost per acquisition), and it’s what you’ll need to manage your online advertising spend.

Now let’s look at the example of a lead and how to figure out the right price you can afford for this. Let’s say you have a website that sells a pool-cleaning service. An average client will spend $1000/yr if they sign up for your service. Let’s say it costs you $500 in salaries and chemicals and all that to perform this service. You’re left with $500 of profit. Is your CPA $500? Nope. You have to figure out how many leads it takes to get a real client. Let’s say 10% of your leads actually turn into a paying client. In that case your target CPA is $50. If you spend more than $50 you’re going to eat into your profits (or even lose money). So the calculation for a lead is similar to the calculation for an online sale with the exception that not every lead turns into a sale.

I’ll say right now that there is no “right” price for a CPA. Every business is different. We see CPAs from $1.50 to $300. It depends completely on the product or service that is being sold, and how much profit there is built into the price of that product or service.

Once you have these numbers, go back to any online advertising campaigns you are running and do a gut check on what you’re spending. Many times businesses are shocked to find out they have been spending $300 to get a sale when they can only accept $50. Don’t fret, this just means that you need to optimize your campaigns. Take out those expensive keywords you’re bidding on that are not turning into sales fast enough. Drop the prices on keywords that do convert to sales but are slightly over the cost you can afford. And make sure you’re spending your money in the right places (for some Trada customers Yahoo is actually much cheaper to acquire a customer on than Google).

A little calculating up front and a bit of work afterward can quickly get you back to using online advertising in a profitable way!

3 Problems With Keyword Generators for Small PPC Campaigns

A common question I get when explaining the value of Trada’s collaborative PPC campaign approach is “Can’t I just use a keyword generator to find all the keywords I need?” Businesses new to paid search are always looking for shortcuts and ways to make their PPC campaigns more effective – so it’s not inherently a bad question. My response though is always, “have you used one and what were the results?” I can say that 100% of the time the answer is that the inquirer has not used a keyword generator tool before (and thus never felt the wrath that these tools can incur).

There are lots of different keyword generators and suggestion tools out there:

And a host of others…

While I am not throwing all keyword tools under the bus (or the use of them) there are some serious things you need to watch out for when using keyword generators. These issues are exacerbated when you have a relatively small monthly budget (<$2000).

Problem #1: Unapplicable Keywords

All keyword generators let very unapplicable keywords into their final data sets. While the tools have gotten much better over the years, if you don’t take a look at every keyword and consider its applicability to your campaign, you’re going to load up some landmines. I always work from the basic premise that some users will click on any ad no matter what search result was typed in or what the ad says. This is the lazy/unknowledgeable user problem. If you don’t believe me, put an ad into your PPC campaign for Crystal Stemware with the keyword “Britney Spears” and watch the clicks rack up (until Quality Score beats you down).

Solution #1:

Review every keyword you want to use from a generator before you upload it to your campaign. There is simply no way around this activity.

Problem #2: High Demand, Very Broad, Low Converting Keywords

Keyword generators work by building semantic models of what people search on. This does not necessarily correlate to buying intent. Most keyword generators will produce somewhat general keywords even though they may be 3 to 4 words long. This is natural because the semantic models are influenced by what is searched on the most. The problem is these search terms are general because people don’t refine their searches on the first shot. In addition, they are the most susceptible to very wide interpretation by broad match (which is the default format most keyword generator tools let you load into Excel). So you’ll get caught in that net. In addition, general terms are more expensive in paid search markets like AdWords. So you’ll be spending a lot of money on these keywords with relative low conversions.

Solution #2:

Start all keywords that are taken from a keyword generator as phrase or exact match. While this will reduce your volume up front, you’ll prevent a lot of unwanted broad matches from chewing up your budget before you can put in negatives. You should selectively add a broad match or two to each ad group to try and fish for related ideas you had not thought of, but phrase and exact match will likely constrain your clicks to more relevant terms. This should drive higher conversion rates and lower costs.

Problem #3: Chewing Up Budget

The final problem caused by the two mentioned above is that a lot of very general broad-match keywords in a small budget campaign will simply elbow out all of the more sophisticated long-tail keywords that could be converting well and thus highly profitable. If you’re spending $1,000/mo, that’s only $33/day. If you are in a keyword space that is on average $2/click (there are many categories that are this expensive if not more) then you’ve got $17 tries a day. If your keywords are very general, it will be easy to spend your whole budget on terms like “business software” or “marketing companies”. Even a few bad broad matches can eat you budget before 10:00am every day. You’ll never learn anything about what your actual customers are really searching for when looking for your unique products or services.

Solution #3:

Start your campaign carefully with phrase and exact match. Be willing to pay a bit more for these as they will likely convert better for you.  If you are not getting the volume you need, start dropping in some of the broad match keywords you think apply. Price them down until you understand how broadly the search engine will match them. Some broad match keywords only ever match search terms exactly; some are widely varying. Look at the search results related to those broad keywords and then work them back into your phrase and exact match while bidding down the broad match keywords and adding negatives. The key here is to proceed with caution lest you burn a lot of money with no results.

In the end, you’ll find that keyword tools are very useful for new ideas but very dangerous as export and upload mechanisms. Good paid search takes time, review and lots of optimization. If a keyword generated campaign seems too easy to be true, it probably is.

What We Are Reading This Week

Fantastic articles this week on small businesses, online marketing and startups.  Trada has been drowning in rain here in Boulder. Also, to entertain ourselves Anna and I wore glow-in-the-dark necklaces all day at work on Thursday. Finally, if you haven’t had a chance be sure to check out Trada CEO Niel Robertson’s interview in Adexchanger.

  • 10 Sites to Compare Google vs Bing Results Side By Side – According to my awesome co-worker Anna, last night’s episode of Gossip Girl had Eleanor Waldorf saying to “Bing It.” Now that both sites are a verb, this post provides 10 sites to breakdown the differences between Bing and Google.
  • Risk and Startups – Mike Perham provides a brutally honest picture of what it’s like to work at a startup and how to mitigate the risks that come from working at one.
  • Facebook’s Ambition – Robert Scoble provides a thorough analysis of all the announcements at the F8 conference and what they mean to marketers, entrepreneurs and the everyday man.
  • Blending Social Media, Ads: ROI Alchemy – MarketingProfs cite the study showing homepage ads on Facebook that “have social media context—that is, they include the names of users’ friends who are already fans of the brand—are 4.0 times more likely than those that don’t to increase purchase intent of a product or brand.”
  • Why Boulder Is America’s Best Town for Startups – Vivek Wadhwa declares Boulder the best town for startups, a fact that I agree wholeheartedly with.
  • Compelling Landing Page Design Is Not Formulaic - Scott Brinker on landing page design, “There are no simple recipes for universal landing page design. To the contrary, the possible ways in which one may design a compelling landing page are unbounded. That’s why design is “creative,” and not merely paint-by-numbers.”
  • Our pick for the best blog post of the week (a must read!) is Building Highly Reliable Websites For Small Companies - Patrick, an entrepreneur with a small business, provides useful tips on keeping your website up. He identifies ways to set expectations, identify risks to your service and mitigating failures before they happen. Good stuff!

And for fun – this week an incredible mix of Lil Wayne vs The Office theme song is making its way to the top of Hypem. Listen to it if you enjoy rappers and Jim Halpert.

How to Manage a Crowd for a Crowdsourcing Business

Managing a crowd of thousands may seem daunting, scary and impossible, but with the right vision, tools, personality, and strategy in place you could build a foundation that will help you manage and most importantly, provide value for your crowd.

Seems easy right? It really isn’t. Believe me, I’ve been managing our crowd of paid search experts for the last 18 months. It takes a diverse skill set to keep the energy of the crowd consistent. It’s one thing to have your crowd present vs. engaged.

From my experience, I’ve learned that one of the ways to be a successful crowd manager is to really understand who’s in your crowd.  Just take a minute and really ask yourself the following questions:

  • Who’s in my crowd?
  • What is each individual in my crowd’s goal or need?
  • Why are they part of this crowd?
  • What is my crowd looking to gain?

This may be a bit overwhelming and almost impossible to study depending on how large your crowd is. But you don’t have to think of it that way.  Think of it in terms of what binds you and your crowd together. You’ll quickly realize that it’s a common interest the crowd breeds despite the different types of individuals who possess different skill sets, knowledge, personalities, and opinions; they all share something in common. They’re all part of your companies’ crowd, which demonstrates the interest they have in what you’re company is providing them.

Take the common interest and mix it with your leadership skills to deeply connect with the crowd you’re managing. You have to keep in mind that the members look to your for guidance, leadership and mentorship. It isn’t about splurging a bunch of information at them and trying to get what you need.

Absolutely not. Many companies take the wrong approach with their crowds. They put their needs in front before the crowds needs. If you take that approach you may turn your crowd into a mob.

It is really about letting your crowd help you define your management practices. When you force things upon a crowd without understanding who they are or their needs, you are setting you and your company up for disaster. The crowd is there for you – let them help guide you. In fact, I’ve found time after time that it is best to go to them with your ideas and questions.  The worst that can happen is someone not responding.

Our CEO Niel Robertson (@nielr1) also recently sat down to give his thoughts on motivating a crowd.

Does Your Business Still Need a Website?

Do you need a website to sell cupcakes? (photo courtesy of The Shoppe)

A recent magazine article making the rounds from Entrepreneur asks this question, “Does Your Business Still Need a Website?” Citing the ability for businesses to maintain a Web presence via strictly social media, the article offers tepid examples of how this can be successful.

Even startups such as Digital Americana, a soon-to-launch web-based multimedia literary and culture magazine designed specifically for the Apple iPad, have been emboldened to launch without a formal website.

“So far,” says Tony Fasciano, the New York-based magazine’s publisher, “by using Tumblr as the main blog site, and creating pages on Twitter and Facebook, we have been able to generate about 100 page views a day–all without yet issuing our first press release.”

While I don’t doubt this can be a successful technique for some companies, the aforementioned Digital Americana is a weak case study. Online marketing should be more measurable than 100 page views a day. Post iPad launch it would be much more valuable to see the examples of downloads to determine success rather the ability to have achieve 100 page views a day. That’s what matters.

One local example of a company using social media rather than a website is Denver cupcake bakery The Shoppe Denver. Yet while they use WordPress as its web platform, it still contains all of the typical components of a website including an About Us, Hours+Location and Weddings page. While the front page is in fact a blog, the rest of the format reflects your run-of-the mill site. Same with Digital Americana. What Entrepreneur is really asking is can your company maintain its website on a blogging platform (e.g. Tumblr or WordPress)? Sure. Who cares about the platform? What matters is that whatever platform you use needs to have comprehensive analytics to understand how your web presence is driving your business.

Curious to hear from SMBs that are either strictly using a blogging platform or forgoing even a blogging platform and just using sites like Twitter or Facebook?

Adexchanger Interviews Trada CEO Niel Robertson

Hot off the presses (or blog…so to speak) is an interview with our CEO Niel Robertson on Adexchanger.com. He discusses the problem Trada is intrinsically trying to solve – making paid search less complex and time consuming for small- to medium-sized businesses.

Trada solves this problem not with technology but with the biggest gap: expertise. And rather than trying to match one PPC expert to a campaign, we create a marketplace and collaborative system where multiple PPC experts (the average is 25) work on a campaign together. The benefit of this is both the diversity of thinking of these experts as well as their constant optimization.

Will Microsoft Coin Change Search Behavior?

Microsoft started a massive rebranding of its search engine from Microsoft Live Search to Bing in the summer of 2009. With the new moniker came interesting new features to support the claim that Bing is not a search engine but a decision engine. Bing focusing initially on four key vertical areas: making a purchase decision (Shopping), planning a trip (Travel), researching a health condition (Health) or finding a local business (Local).  Most of the improvements in these verticals have been addressed by algorithm tweaks and UI improvements but shopping has introduced a new feature that users are starting to care about.

With Bing Microsoft has incorporated a new shopping UI with their previously underwhelming Live Search Cashback program. Now you can use Bing to search for the things you want to buy, and you’ll find cashback offers that give you money back (look for the cashback coin in your search results). Bing Shopping provides many product search refinement tools and also scans the Web for user and expert reviews, organizes them by product attribute, and then ranks the sentiment in the reviews as either positive or negative. Bing also will include customer service numbers for retail sites, the ability to track a package right from the search page and deep links to common pages within the site within some of the results.

With these new features and an $80 to $100 million-dollar ad campaign, has Microsoft been able to put Bing on the search map?

It has certainly raised awareness and Bing has enjoyed increasing search market share for 10 consecutive months. Depending on whose numbers you choose to believe (Hitwise or Comscore) Bing has gone from approximately 7% of all searches to more than 11% since launch.

While it is hard to break out the numbers, Bing’s Shopping vertical seems to be one of the biggest drivers of growth.  As of March 2010, Bing has 1,200 active merchants, 44 million offers and has distributed more than $100 million in earned rewards for consumers. That should be enough to get any shoppers attention.

In the hyper competitive e-commerce landscape, Bing has provided an interesting option for retailers to set themselves apart. As a retailer, you can add products to the Bing Cashback program to get additional visibility and give users a quick path to purchase.  As an advertiser, you are able to submit your products to the engine and pay on a CPA basis, which brought hundreds of retailers to the Bing CashBack program.

The below screenshots highlight a shopping search for a Kodak Zi8 camera on both Google and Bing. As you can see the prices are slightly better on Bing and further more with Bing, I could earn 2%-8% cash back which would net me an additionally $3-$12 that I can redeem from Bing. This obviously can become even more meaningful with larger purchases such as computers or televisions.

The Bing Cashback program provides a strong value proposition for users and advertisers alike, and we believe it will continue to drive the growth of Bing as a whole. So Microsoft is making multi-million dollar bet that you as a searcher are willing to change your behavior to earn a couple bucks back on your purchase.  It is still too early to tell decisively but I would never bet against peoples’ love of free money!

The Googlization of Business

Can Small Businesses Build What Google Needs?

Recently Google announced they would be using website speed more heavily as a “signal” in their ranking methodology. “Signal” is just a nice way of saying “important variable”, but it also indicates how Google thinks about the world. They believe that there are a certain set of things that “good” websites (and thus “good” online business) do. One of these is make sure their user experience does not suck because a business’s website is slow.  Another is to make sure businesses only place PPC ads on keywords that are relevant to their products (this was the genesis of AdWords Quality Score). While all of this is not a bad thing (and Google is not the only company that is driving these kinds of changes), there are some potential downsides.

The downside argument came to me after a discussion I had with some friends about Google’s SEO algorithms, and how there is a small element of Orwellian doublespeak that is creeping into online content production. For example, a basic tenant of SEO is that your content should include lots of keywords that are relevant to your topic. That’s all fine and logical but in the inevitable competitive marketplace that emerges from rewarding those who rank more closely to the top in organic search, it’s actually changing the way people produce content.

I am reminded of a hilarity and tragedy in the opera world I witnessed. My father is an opera conductor and has many times in his career collaborated on and conducted world premier operas (e.g. Anna Karenina at Opera Theater of St Louis). Yes, I think my dad kicks ass. That set aside, what was funny to me was watching a collaboration between he, David Carlson (the composer) and Colin Graham (the librettist) on the score. At one point my father said something tongue in cheek, “Union rules require us to get the orchestra in and out in 3 hours. If we go 15 minutes over we have to pay double time and this will significantly change the cost of the production. So should we just play faster or cut something out?” In the end, they did cut parts of the opera out, simply because of union rules. How’s that for constrained artistic expression?

I’ve read numerous articles about how to SEO a Press Release (e.g. pack it with keywords that you want to be highly listed in). We also have started at Trada to change our website, content, and create specialized landing pages packed with keywords to get higher rankings in Google and also better Quality Scores (and thus less costly clicks and conversions in PPC). While Google allows for some creative freedom in content, there is definitely a penalty for being too verbose or too general about content you are writing. One does wonder where the logical conclusion of this strategy takes all of us.

Enter a small business into the equation. Most small businesses are simply working their asses off to make their products or deliver their services as best they can. The thought of competing in a global marketplace of advertisers who are constantly trying to outgame them in SEO, PPC, link building, etc. blows most of their minds. In the old days, SMBs were about picking a good location, putting up some signage, getting a yellow page ad and then trying to do the best you could for anyone who walked in your door or picked up your phone. Not anymore. You have to have a content rich website, blog heavily, do social media, get links back to you, manage your listings in Yelp (the new BBB), SEO your site and now make sure your site is fast enough to be considered a good business.

I’m not sure how I feel about all of this yet and how real it really is. A big part of me likes the idea of a gigantic free and competitive marketplace, but part of me also knows not everyone has the same ability (skill, money, or time) to compete in this market. Maybe what I am witnessing is simply a maturation of the Internet where everything needs to grow up a bit. People who want to run businesses need to understand this is the reality (and opportunity) they now live in. Universities need to change their curriculum to teach the next generation of business leaders, marketers, sales people, and executives how to survive in a data-driven, competitive landscape of this sort. And of course new tiers of players (such as Trada) need to emerge to fill the skills gap that will always exist between those who can afford the expertise and those who have to compete against them on a shoestring.

Either way, the times they are a’changing. And for good measure: Google, doublespeak, AdWords, SEO.

What We're Reading This Week

Ben Good Reads About...Brewing

It was a fun week for Trada with CEO Niel Robertson (@nielr1) making his acting debut on YouTube. We’ll also be talking shortly about some changes we’ve made to the Trada marketplace recently. Plus, my co-worker Matt Hessler (@fasterstill) came to work as a 1960′s ad man. Right after the picture was taken, Matt had a manly cocktail and yelled at some underlings. Hope your week was as eventful as ours was. Looking for some good reads this week in paid search, small businesses and entrepreneurship? Here you are! As always, shoot me an e-mail with your suggestions for good posts elaine at trada.com.

And for fun – I think this is the most hilarious video of the week – Foursquare Cops.